At the request of some readers, and friends in some forums, I decided to dust off my Nike Free 3.0 shoes and give them some testing.  The point here is to answer questions about transition shoes.  I personally am a big believer in a healthy transition from conventional shoes to barefoot/minimal running.  The foot needs time to adapt and build itself up before you can really get out there and run completely bare without any great risks.  Enter the 3.0’s.  So is the Nike Free a good minimalist shoe?  Is it just like running barefoot?  Is it some devilish attempt by the big bad shoe companies to trick us?  I’ve got all those answers for you, but you’re going to have to keep reading.

I am no stranger to the Nike Free, as I wore it for a few years as my main choice of footwear.  I enjoyed the idea of the shoe and the fact that the shoe bends and flexes a lot, which is great for getting the foot some freedom.  I even ran the Goofy Challenge at Disney World in this pair of Frees so I’m used to them, but I have not worn them for quite some time. I gave them up because even in this flexible shoe my knee was in a lot of pain throughout the day and the only thing that helped was completely ditching the shoes.  So the first thing I did was wear them to work a couple of times just to let my foot get used to being in a shoe again as well as to try and determine whether or not running in these again would cause me any problems.  I made it through the trial periods ok so I did decide to give them a good run, and that one run was all I needed.

The shoe is very well constructed and employs some great science.  The first of which is the deep cuts in the sole from front to back and side to side.  They allow the shoe to flex in just about any direction, which will help activate the musculature of the foot.  The laces run at an angle towards the outside of the foot.  This is done to keep tightness off of the top of the foot, which can be a hindrance to foot flexion as well as circulation.  The toe box is not wide, but the mesh of the upper is stretchy enough that it feels that way.

The first thing I noticed about these shoes is the insole is way too built up for me.  The arch support built into the insole felt like a big rock just pressing on the underside of my foot.  It also has extra padding in the forefoot and under the heel so the shoe is very soft and squishy.  At first this feels good like you’re on marshmallows or something, but it soon became such an annoyance for me that, coupled with the painful arch buildup, the insoles had to go.  With the insoles out, the shoe feels much flatter and also stiffer, which is great for a barefooter like me.  One of the biggest benefits of barefoot running is being able to feel the ground, and a soft squishy shoe just does not let that happen.  Rolling back and forth in the shoes had an interesting feel.  I could feel the deep cuts in the sole allowing my foot to move and flex, but it was not in a natural way.  I’ll take this opportunity to point out that the feel is not bad.  It’s just not what I’ve grown used to since ditching shoes.  Standing around and just walking in this shoe with no insoles is fairly comfortable.  When walking, the natural movement is to heel strike so the built up heel did its job nicely by keeping me from feeling any pain in my heels.  The problem is the heel measures at 17mm and the forefoot only 10mm.  That 7mm drop is pretty obvious with each step, and though it was not a real problem for my feet just walking around, I found that my knees were not big fans of the elevation.  Still, as a walking shoe this passed.  It is a great option for transition because of this.  If you have stiff or weak feet this shoe can go a long way to helping you correct those issues without putting too much stress and strain on your lower limbs.

I set out for a two hour run wearing these shoes, and I did not make it – partly because of the shoe and partly the heat.  It’s getting pretty hot here in Texas, and these shoes did a great job of keeping my feet from knowing how hot the pavement under me was, but that’s what all shoes do.  Within the first hundred meters I could feel one big glaring issue with the shoe, and that was the heel.  It is very easy to get a forefoot landing in these shoes, and that was nice.  The flexible sole came in very handy for letting my feet land the way I wanted them to and not be forced into a heel strike landing.  Still, the thickness of the heel became an issue.  I could come down on my forefoot with smoothness, and it all felt very natural until the heel came down. The thickness of the sole kept my foot from really doing anything.  Just after my forefoot hit the ground, my heel hit the shoe, and that was the end of my footfall.  My arch was not allowed much of a flex so I was forced into using my hips and glutes quite a bit to compensate for what my foot usually does.  I am not one to disagree with an opportunity to hit muscles in new ways, and this was not creating any pains that caused concern so I considered this an interesting training twist even though it meant that my feet were not getting much work on this run.

I ran three miles out and held a fairly good pace.  One of the things I noticed was that I was putting my foot down with more force than usual, and I can only attribute that to the thicker sole of the shoe.  Studies have shown that the thicker the sole the more force we put our feet down with in an effort to get feedback.  It was not a big issue because the shoe protected me, and I was able to maintain a good form for those three miles.  The problem was that my legs were getting worn out trying to compensate for the lack of spring that normally came from my feet.  It was hot, and I was wearing out pretty fast so I decided to turn around and head for home.  I also started to develop blisters on my toes during the three miles out.  I was wearing Injinji toe socks and was still getting a lot of friction.  The toe box felt wide enough just walking around but proved to be a little too tight on this run.  My two-hour run would now become a “whatever time it is when I get home is fine with me” run.  I was able to knock out another mile before I was forced to walk.  I decided to implement the Galloway method of run/walk intervals to get me home, and every time I began running after a walk I could instantly feel the lack of foot flexion and feel my glutes start firing with a nice burning sensation.  I wore out pretty fast after that and did a lot more walking than I am used to.  For the last mile I took off the shoes and was able to run in fairly easily and at a fast pace, which led me to believe there was some merit to my idea that the heel was creating an issue.

So what do I think?  Is this a minimal shoe?  Does it feel just like being barefoot as Nike said?  The answer to those two questions is no.  It feels nothing like being barefoot, and given the thickness of the sole as well as the heel to toe drop, it’s not minimal.  I do not think it can be placed in the minimalist shoe category at all.

The shoe does have merit, and is not a bad shoe.  The sole is the most flexible sole of any conventional shoe out there.  If you are a person who is wearing stiff, supportive, stability and motion controlled shoes then the Nike Free is a great option for you.  It will help you loosen and strengthen your feet with no question.  The movement and flexion is great for a beginner because the shoe is flexible but still protective enough to keep you from over doing it and risking injury.  I have used it with a lot of clients over the years with very good results.  It’s like sending your feet to the gym but not overdoing it.  If you’ve only been in regular shoes then the first day you wear these you will feel soreness in your feet and possibly your calves, and that is what you are looking for; an awakening.

Final thoughts are that if you are already a good barefoot/minimalist runner, I would not recommend this for you at all.  It just doesn’t work for that purpose.  If you are a beginner and want to ease your way into it then this is the perfect shoe to get you started.  Not bad Nike, just not great.

Note:  There are multiple versions of the Nike Free running shoe.  The 3.0 is the most flexible.  The 5.0, 7.0, and Run+ all have a thicker heel, as well as less flexibility in the sole from fused sections and shallower grooves, depending on the model.  I’ve tried them all and feel that if you are going to invest in a pair of Frees you should bypass the other models and head straight for the 3.0.


7 responses »

  1. Mom says:

    I’m so proud of you son you have come along way, keep up the good work:)

  2. Jimmy, hi!
    Great review!
    That Dallas heat was getting to me. I was seriously considering getting the Vibram Five Fingers at Luke’s Locker that day I met you at Barefoot Ken Bob’s workshop back in May,mostly because my wife was worrying about what I’d be wearing during the summer months. But as soon as it started getting hot, all I simply did was go out running earlier in the morning from around 7-9am. That pretty much did it. After around 10am, forget it; the pavement and sidewalks got too hot for running barefoot.
    Thank you for reviewing the Nike 3.0. That was one of the models I was considering to buy several months back but never did.
    I’m in Bogota, Colombia for a few months. I’ve mostly been running at night around the blacktop basketball court in front of my house. It’s not too fun running round and round, but it gets it done. All barefoot. Haven’t felt the need to buy any Vibram Five Fingers nor any other kind of shoe to transition straight into barefooting. However, one of the forum members at Barefoot Ken Bob’s site who is doing an internship at Terra Plana is kindly sending me a pair of EVO shoes to try out for feedback. I’ll be wearing those for sure when the temperatures go back down again during the cold months. Have you tried the EVO? Any thoughts?
    Will you be posting any Dallas race calendars that include barefoot friendly races?
    Best wishes to you as always,

    • Algis! My world traveling friend. It is always great to hear from you and I am impressed with how well you are doing with your barefoot running. It does get hot out here in Texas and I’m sure Columbia is no picnic either. I run midday so shoes are a must but your dedication to get up early and get your running in is very impressive.

      I personally have no experience with the Evo from Terra Plana although I would love to try it! I’ve been trying to get a pair for a while now so I can review them for you guys but so far no luck. Maybe soon though; you never know.

      Keep up the good work my friend and definitely keep in touch.

  3. Jason Oliver says:

    Hi Jimmy,

    Nice review. Very relevant to my current situation. I’d appreciate your advice.

    I’ve been transitioning from huge, stiff running shoes to barefoot. I started out in Vibrams, got a stress fracture, then restarted with a mix of Nike Free 3.0 and pure barefoot. It’s been going well the last couple months, but do you think I should ditch the Nike Frees completely and just go barefoot, but with few miles?

    Would love your opinion, as the nice folks at the BRS are telling me to ditch the Nike Frees, but I’m scared off another foot injury.

    Thanks in advance.

    • Jason, I like the idea of you getting less time in the Free if your goal is to not be running in that type of shoe anymore. If your desire is to run bare or in a minimal shoe then at some point you will have to lessen the time run in your Frees. If you’ve been successful at going back and forth between the shoes for a couple of months then you can approach it a couple of ways. You can drop the Free and just run bare and minimal and maybe just cut back overall mileage as you build. The other option would be to transfer miles from the Free to your bare miles. Say you run 10 miles a week in the Free and 5 bare then next week run 9 and 6. See how that feels and continue swapping the miles as your comfort and strength level allow you. I know my BRS brethren love to get bare feet on the ground but I personally have no issues with a good transition. Good luck and please let me know if i can be of assistance in the future.

  4. StephenB says:

    Exactly my experience in the 5.0s — heel way to big and toebox too narrow. I’m looking forward to some of the new crop of shoes coming out next hear with zero heel-to-toe drop.

  5. Hosam Habib says:

    I just bought one and it was the most horrible shoes i ever used . The pressure on my toes and arc is unbelievable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s